If the Pakistani government does not make any major alliance with regard to occupied Kashmir in the near future, the demeanor of Pakistani public sentiment will fall on the Pakistani government and empowered people. In relation to Indian-occupied Kashmir, Pakistan has three areas in front of it. The first is the Public of Pakistan, the second is the Public of India and the third is the International Public. The situation of Indian persecution and oppression of the oppressed Kashmiris in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir is being communicated to the Public of the above three areas, the first of which is that it recognizes the government’s statements in relation to the Public Kashmir of Pakistan.
Pakistani governments have always been successful in that they find their public wholeheartedly for Kashmir’s independence. Secondly, Pakistani governments have not been able to influence the Indian public in the matter of Indian occupation of Kashmir in the slightest.
Thirdly, Pakistani governments were apparently less successful in associating the international public with Kashmir.
Against the Indian action of August 5, 2019 to include the Kashmir Valley of Jammu and Srinagar in the Indian Union, Pakistan has tried its best to convey its response to the above three area public, with regard to the second and third two area public. Different results came out. Pakistan’s public, as before, looked at the oppressed Kashmiris.
The second area in front of Pakistan is also the Indian public. This public too noticed some change. This means that even inside India this time, there is a slight and loud voice against the inclusion of occupied Kashmir in the Indian Union. Which included leadership such as Farooq Abdullah, Omar Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti.
What was different about the international public was that Pakistan had some apparent diplomatic successes internationally. Of course their benefits were not immediate, but the news against the Indian initiative and the oppressed Kashmiris began to gain international attention. The following are likely to be possible in all three areas of the strategy that has been shown to Pakistani oppressed people of Indian occupation after the August 5 attacks in the Pakistani public, Indian Public and International Public.
If this happens, will Kashmiris accept it? The Kashmiris who have been offering their lives for more than a century before the Dogra Raj and the Indian armies, will they not even start a resistance movement in the wake of some mediation? International friendship means every country has its own interests. After August 5, it has become clear to the Pakistani public that in the case of Indian occupied Kashmir, international countries are prioritizing their interests with India. Is the international diploma that Pakistan has gotten a little too diplomatic in relation to Kashmir internationally?
